Comparison between AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT vs. RX 5700

Comparison between AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT vs. RX 5700

Less than a year ago, AMD introduced its Navi family, which includes the new 7nm RDNA architecture with the RX 5700 and RX 5700 XT models, and surprisingly a few months later, it made the announcement of a superior model: AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary. It basically has the same specifications as the RX 5700 XT, with a slight increase in computing performance. For now, we bring you the comparison of AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT vs. RX 5700, so you can decide with which of the two you stay. And so you can have a better picture, we also recommend the comparison between RX 5700 XT and Nvidia RTX 2060 Super.

AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT vs. RX 5700


The key to this comparison will always be in performance. The gross power of these two cards is its biggest differentiating factor, so the question is: is it worth spending $ 50 dollars more for the added capabilities of the 5700 XT? Let's take a first look at the specifications to get an idea of ​​what we are facing.

Radeon RX 5700 XT Radeon RX 5700
Architecture RDNA RDNA
Computation Units 40 36
Processors 2,560 2,304
Base clock 1,605MHz 1,465MHz
Game clock 1,755MHz 1,625MHz
Boost clock 1,905MHz 1,725MHz
Memory 8GB GDDR6 8GB GDDR6
Bandwidth 448GBps 448GBps
TDP 225w 180w
Price $ 399 $ 349

The first difference between these two cards is in their number of computing units. The RX 5700 XT has a little more than 10 percent more with 40 CUs, compared to the 5700 XT of 36 CUs. This amounts to the same difference in transmission processors (Stream Processors) and should be an important component in the performance differentiation between the two cards.

Another important factor is the base frequency. This variable is 150MHz higher in the 5700 XT and the “Game clock“, The typical clock speed that can be expected during a sustained load is 130MHz ms. This is not likely to have a big impact on overall performance, but it all helps. The boost clock o Maximum load speed is much higher in the XT, but with the cooling below the torque on these cards, we do not expect either of them to approach that speed for more than a fraction of a second near the beginning of a load.

As for memory, both cards are the same with identical GDDR6 configurations and an identical bandwidth of 448GBps. The 5700 XT has a considerable increase in TDP requirements, which makes it a major candidate for the aftermarket cooling, although you might suggest that there will be more free space for overclocking in the 5700.

In our 3DMark Time Spy test both cards work well. The 5700 XT was able to keep up with the RTX 2060 Super and the Radeon VII, with the 5700 delayed by only one hair above 10%. Considering that it is 12.5 percent cheaper, it is a fair result.

In game tests, both cards prove to be very capable at both 1080p and 1440p, with more than a playable frame rate (40-80 FPS) at 4K in Fortnite, Battlefield 5 and Civilization VI. Overall, we see that the RX 5700 has a yield of approximately 10 percent of the RX 5700 XT. In some cases, they are closer.

If what you are looking for is a general performance, the 5700 XT is clearly the best card, but if the value for money is important to you and that additional $ 50 will be more useful in other purchases, the 5700 XT is a good option. This is especially true in 1440p, where it handles more than 100 FPS in Civilization VI and about l in Battlefield 5Y Fortnite.

Refrigeration and Overclocking

AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT vs. RX 5700

One of the biggest problems facing the RX 5700 XT and the RX 5700 is that type heatsinks blower They do not live up to the circumstances. Although some have found that new thermal pasta and added washers can make a big difference, the refrigerators out of the box on these cards are not very good. They are noisy and do not cool the GPU sufficiently to avoid acceleration, which is why we do not see these cards reach maximum load speed as AMD claims they are capable.

Because of this and some problems with the launch drivers, the overclocking In the 5700 XT and 5700 models it is not very good at the moment. But it could be. With an RX 5700 XT in a custom water cooling circuit with a 95 percent increase in the power limit, IgorsLab accelerated it to more than 2.1 GHz in the core. That results in an increase in frame rate of just over 11 percent in Shadow of the Tomb Raider.

That is a very interesting perspective for tweakers and those who are considering buying a custom 5700 XT with improved cooling when they launch in August.

The 5700, on the other hand, seems to have some kind of limiting factor beyond drivers and thermal. In an independent test, IgorsLab reached 1,800 MHz in the core with a 20 percent increase in the power limit. That can be a hard block that AMD has launched to prevent the 5700 from exceeding the performance of a 5700 XT. We will have to wait for more mature controllers to make sure that is the case, but it can be something that can be overcome with a flash BIOS

The great advantage of overclocking of the RX 5700 series at the moment is that it is not excellent, but the potential is there.With better cooling and some adjustments and additional tests, these cards can be excellent overclockers. If that time comes, the 5700 can exceed 5700 XT if its cooling stops. But with much greater room for maneuver, at least for now, the 5700 XT seems to be the best overclocker.

Wait for custom cards

The AMD RX 5700 and 5700 XT are an exciting launch of AMD. The first to use the new RDNA architecture, these cards show great potential with better cooling and more mature controllers. However, considering the heat and volume of the reference cards, we strongly recommend waiting for the personalized cards before buying one of these. It is not much to wait, and we will know much more about the true capabilities of this generation in August with those personalized cards.

But if you have to buy a new Radeon GPU to take advantage of FreeSync or want to get the best value from these two cards at this time, the 5700 is the best of both. Its performance is better than its lower price might suggest, and be less demanding with the limited cooling capacity offered by the type heatsink design blower